Robert Haas wrote: > On Sun, Feb 6, 2011 at 11:12 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > > Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> writes: > >> Bruce Momjian wrote: > >>> remove tags. > > > >> Sorry, vague commit message (I forgot squash). > > > >> Can I will use git ammend to improve this message? > > Absolutely not. > > > How about git revert, instead? ?It's not apparent to me that these > > changes were improvements. > > I'll buy that one.
[ CC to docs, committers removed. ] Well, if we want to revert, then we have to add <literal> to all the numbers used in our docs --- there was no logic in what we previously had. Do we want that? Here is an example line I did not change: an otherwise idle connection. A value of 0 uses the system default. Do we want that 0 to appear in a fixed-width font via <literal>? It is easy to do but we should decide. -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + It's impossible for everything to be true. + -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
