On Sun, Feb 6, 2011 at 2:12 PM, Jaime Casanova <ja...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 11:32 PM, Joachim Wieland <j...@mcknight.de> wrote: >> On Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 5:26 PM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> The parallel pg_dump portion of this patch (i.e. the still-uncommitted >>> part) no longer applies. Please rebase. >> >> Here is a rebased version with some minor changes as well. I haven't >> tested it on Windows now but will do so as soon as the Unix part has >> been reviewed. >> > > code review: >
ah! two other things i forget: - there is no docs - pg_dump and pg_restore are inconsistent: pg_dump requires the directory to be provided with the -f option: pg_dump -Fd -f dir_dump pg_restore pass the directory as an argument for -Fd: pg_restore -Fd dir_dump -- Jaime Casanova www.2ndQuadrant.com Professional PostgreSQL: Soporte y capacitación de PostgreSQL -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
