On Sun, Feb 6, 2011 at 1:23 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > I've not attempted to implement this idea, but offhand it looks like > it would take a day or two's work, which seems well worthwhile to > expend now in the hope of getting this feature right the first time. > > Comments?
The design you propose seems pretty good, and I don't think we can commit this without this change. The scheduling implications are not great, but since this seems like an important patch I guess we should live with it, so +1. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
