Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> writes: > While I'm looking at this ... what is the rationale for treating rewrite > rules as members of extensions, ie, why does the patch touch > rewriteDefine.c? ISTM a rule is a property of a table and could not > sensibly be an independent member of an extension. If there is a use > for that, why are table constraints and triggers not given the same > treatment?
I remember thinking I needed to do that for CREATE VIEW support while discovering PostgreSQL internals. Regards. -- Dimitri Fontaine http://2ndQuadrant.fr PostgreSQL : Expertise, Formation et Support -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
