Sounds great to me. Mostly why I made the remark that I wasn't happy with the solution due to using type unknown.
any and _any it is. -- Rod ----- Original Message ----- From: "Nicolas Bazin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Rod Taylor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Tom Lane" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: "Hackers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 3:10 AM Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Array iterators > Just a small remark, type name "any" would be more meaningfull than > "unknown". Also it's widely used (CORBA for example) and may enter in the > STL someday. > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Tom Lane" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Rod Taylor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: "Hackers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 2:48 PM > Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Array iterators > > I believe that the best ultimate resolution of these problems will > > involve creating a spectrum of "pseudo-types" with different, sharply > > defined meanings. Breaking up "opaque/type 0" is going to cause a > > lot of backward-compatibility pain, so I have not been in a big hurry > > to do it --- but let's get it right the first time when dealing with > > shades of "unknown". ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? http://www.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/faq.html
