On Feb 2, 2011, at 9:03 AM, Dimitri Fontaine wrote: > Well, fair enough I suppose. Or it would be if you gave me an > alternative that provides a simpler way to support those 3 upgrades.
I did: a naming convention with upgrade scripts that have the version number in them. You rejected it. > Of course if that's too much for you, you can also choose to only > support upgrades one versions at a time and provide only two scripts. > Note also that I don't recall of any proposal on the table that would > help with that situation, so I'm all ears. http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2011-01/msg00296.php Best, David -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
