On Mon, 2011-01-31 at 18:21 -0500, Robert Haas wrote: > > Ready to commit if no objection. > > ISTM it should still be in class 40. There's nothing wrong with the > user's authorization; we've just decided to roll back the transaction > for our own purposes.
OK. BTW, anybody know why we have PL/pgSQL condition codes for conditions that can't be trapped by PL/pgSQL? ERRCODE_ADMIN_SHUTDOWN and ERRCODE_DATABASE_DROPPED are always FATAL. Seems like pointless code to me. -- Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/books/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training and Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
