On Tue, 2002-05-14 at 07:08, Tom Lane wrote: > You have no fear that that "sed" will substitute some places it > shouldn't have? Also, what makes you think this'll be a "rarely > used" feature? I'd guess that people load dumps every day into > databases that have different names than the ones they dumped from. > Don't see why the same is not likely to be true at the schema level.
A pg_restore option would presumably be more reliable than sed. -- Oliver Elphick [EMAIL PROTECTED] Isle of Wight http://www.lfix.co.uk/oliver GPG: 1024D/3E1D0C1C: CA12 09E0 E8D5 8870 5839 932A 614D 4C34 3E1D 0C1C "Yea, though I walk through the valley of the shadow of death, I will fear no evil, for thou art with me; thy rod and thy staff they comfort me." Psalms 23:4
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
