> Actually, even for those that wuldn't need the patch ... as long as the > "default behaviour" doesn't change, and unless there are no valid > technical arguments around it, there is no reason why a patch shouldn't be > included ...
Unless it's going to interfere with implementing the general case in the future, making it a painful feature to keep backwards-compatibility with. Which is what the discussion was about IIRC... Chris ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
