Thanks Tom,
On Mon, 13 May 2002, Tom Lane wrote:
> Oleg Bartunov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > tour=# explain analyze select * from tours where
> > ( operator_id in (2,3,4,5,7) and type_id = 2 ) or
> > ( operator_id = 8 and type_id=4 );
>
> > Index Scan using type_idx, type_idx, type_idx, type_idx, type_idx, type_idx on
>tours (cost=0.00..12.25 rows=1 width=1091) (actual time=0.26..0.26 rows=0 loops=1)
>
> > What does many 'type_idx' means ?
>
> Multiple indexscans.
>
> It looks to me like your WHERE clause is being flattened into
>
> ( operator_id = 2 and type_id=2 ) or
> ( operator_id = 3 and type_id=2 ) or
> ( operator_id = 4 and type_id=2 ) or
> ( operator_id = 5 and type_id=2 ) or
> ( operator_id = 7 and type_id=2 ) or
> ( operator_id = 8 and type_id=4 )
>
this is what I assume.
> and then it has a choice of repeated indexscans on operator_id or
> type_id. Depending on the selectivity stats it might pick either.
> You might find that a 2-column index on both would be a win.
>
Yes, we've went exactly this way.
I'm very exited how planner could be smart. When I played with the query
and specify different values of type_id I notice it's chose plans depends
on is value exists or not.
> regards, tom lane
>
Regards,
Oleg
_____________________________________________________________
Oleg Bartunov, sci.researcher, hostmaster of AstroNet,
Sternberg Astronomical Institute, Moscow University (Russia)
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.sai.msu.su/~megera/
phone: +007(095)939-16-83, +007(095)939-23-83
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
