On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 10:01 PM, Andrew Dunstan <and...@dunslane.net> wrote: > > > On 01/27/2011 08:51 AM, Robert Haas wrote: >> >> On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 7:31 AM, Xiaobo Gu<guxiaobo1...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> 20:25<jon_y>: please contact psql and ask for a list of accept() >>> implementations checked >> >> It looks like we check each argument and the return type for a couple >> of possibilities: >> >> argument 1 can be int or unsigned int >> argument 2 can be struct sockaddr * or const struct sockaddr * or void * >> argument 3 can be int * or size_t * or socklen_t * or unsigned int * or >> void * >> the return type can be int or unsigned int PASCAL >> >> > > Yeah. it looks like the return type is the likely culprit. It looks like it > wants either a signed or unsigned int64. Also, the mingw64 API uses the > WSAAPI qualifier instead of PASCAL. >
I am still trying, but I think it may be the first argument, because MinGW64 define SOCKET as a pointer, but you accept int or unsigned int Xiaobo Gu -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
