Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes:
> Oh, really? I was thinking the logic should go into find_coercion_pathway().
Well, I've been saying right along that it should be in
eval_const_expressions. Putting this sort of optimization in the parser
is invariably the wrong thing, because it fails to catch all the
possibilities. As an example, inlining a SQL function could expose
opportunities of this type. Another issue is that premature
optimization in the parser creates headaches if conditions change such
that a previous optimization is no longer valid --- you may have stored
rules wherein the optimization was already applied. (Not sure that
specific issue applies to casting, since we have no ALTER CAST commmand;
but in general you want expression optimizations applied downstream from
the rule rewriter not upstream.)
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
