Simon Riggs <si...@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> On Sun, 2011-01-23 at 20:33 +0200, Marko Tiikkaja wrote:
>> \d table now only shows that there's a FOREIGN KEY, which might lead the
>> user to think that there should not be any values that don't exist in
>> the referenced table.
> Neither \d nor \di shows invalid indexes.
Even if that were true, it's a poor analogy, since a disabled foreign
key has visible *semantic* impact, whereas a disabled index doesn't.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
