On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 10:34 AM, Magnus Hagander <mag...@hagander.net> wrote: > Um, none of the fields I've suggested so far was "connection string". > In fact, that would be Pretty Darn Hard without modifying the client > to actually *send* the connection string. Which id doesn't.
So... is there centralized structure which contains the info you're thinking of exposing? -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
