On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 1:12 PM, Fujii Masao <masao.fu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> + r = PQgetCopyData(conn, ©buf, 0);
>>> + if (r == -1)
>>>
>>> Since -1 of PQgetCopyData might indicate an error, in this case,
>>> we would need to call PQgetResult?.
>>
>> Uh, -1 means end of data, no? -2 means error?
>
> The comment in pqGetCopyData3 says
>
> /*
> * On end-of-copy, exit COPY_OUT or COPY_BOTH mode and let caller
> * read status with PQgetResult(). The normal case is that it's
> * Copy Done, but we let parseInput read that. If error, we expect
> * the state was already changed.
> */
>
> Also the comment in getCopyDataMessage says
>
> /*
> * If it's a legitimate async message type, process it. (NOTIFY
> * messages are not currently possible here, but we handle them for
> * completeness.) Otherwise, if it's anything except Copy Data,
> * report end-of-copy.
> */
>
> So I thought that. BTW, walreceiver has already done that.
When PQgetCopyData returns -1, PQgetResult should be called. This is true.
But when I read the patch again, I found that Magnus has already done that.
So my comment missed the point :( Sorry for noise.
+ res = PQgetResult(conn);
+ if (!res || PQresultStatus(res) != PGRES_COMMAND_OK)
+ {
+ fprintf(stderr, _("%s: final receive failed: %s\n"),
+ progname, PQerrorMessage(conn));
+ exit(1);
+ }
Regards,
--
Fujii Masao
NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION
NTT Open Source Software Center
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
