On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 9:35 PM, Mark Kirkwood <mark.kirkw...@catalyst.net.nz> wrote: > On 21/01/11 15:24, Robert Haas wrote: >> >> On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 9:17 PM, Kevin Grittner >> <kevin.gritt...@wicourts.gov> wrote: >>> >>> Right -- God only knows the number of things were filtered out to >>> leave me with filtered water. What's "filtered" in this case is what >>> was passed through, not what was removed. >> >> Hmm, I guess I see your point now. Well, I'm not wedded to the name, >> but I don't like removed any better. >> >> Rows eliminated? >> > > Rows filtered *out* ?
Seems like Tom just had the same thought. Works for me. I'm still not thrilled with the proposed formatting, but I can probably live with it. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
