On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 08:55:22PM -0500, Robert Haas wrote: > On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 7:57 PM, Simon Riggs <si...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > > On Wed, 2011-01-19 at 17:46 -0500, Noah Misch wrote: > > > >> I'll go ahead and mark the patch Returned with Feedback. > > > > My understanding of the meaning of that is polite rejection. If you do > > that there is no further author comment and we move to July 2011. That > > then also rejects your own patch with what you say is an alternative > > implementation... > > > > Is that what you wish? That isn't what I wish, either way. I suggest you > > mark it Waiting on Author, so we can discuss it further. > > Simon, > > I have no idea what you're talking about here. It is entirely fitting > and appropriate to reject a patch the guts of which have not been > written four days into the final CommitFest. Doing so does not > somehow reject Noah's patches, which stand or fall on their own > merits.
I think Simon was referring to the proof-of-concept sketch I had included with my review. -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
