"David E. Wheeler" <da...@kineticode.com> writes: > On Jan 18, 2011, at 1:39 PM, Tom Lane wrote: >> At the moment my opinion is that gist__int_ops is too broken to be >> usable, and it's also too uncommented to be fixable by anyone other >> than the original author.
> That seems to jibe with your comments from last year: > http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-performance/2009-03/msg00265.php Well, based on what I saw just now, I believe there are one or more actual bugs in there, not just that it's straining the design capacity of the opclass. I think the "lossy" aspect isn't working at all. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
