On Sun, 2011-01-16 at 14:28 -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > One other point here is that I find messages like this a mite > unreadable: > > function 1 (oidvector[], oidvector[]) btoidvectorcmp(oidvector,oidvector) of > operator family array_ops for access method gin > > If we were to go with this, I'd be strongly tempted to rearrange all > four of the messages involved to put the operator or function name > at the end, eg > > function 1 (oidvector[], oidvector[]) of operator family array_ops for access > method gin: btoidvectorcmp(oidvector,oidvector)
Yes, I agree with you that the second is much more readable with out without the lefttype and righttype. function 1 of operator family array_ops for access method gin: btoidvectorcmp(oidvector,oidvector) is more readable in my opinion than, function 1 btoidvectorcmp(oidvector,oidvector) of operator family array_ops for access method gin Regards, Andreas -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
