On Jan15, 2011, at 02:03 , Tom Lane wrote: > Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes: >> Me, too. But I don't agree with your particular choice of small >> syntax adjustment. Maybe we should just let the issue drop for now. >> Nobody's actually complained about this that I can recall; it's just a >> comment that's been sitting there in pg_dump for ages, and I was >> inspired to think of it again because of the SQL/MED work. I'm not >> sufficiently in love with this idea to walk through fire for it. > > Agreed. Once there's some pressing need for it, it'll be easier to make > the case that some amount of incompatibility is acceptable.
Assuming that day will come eventually, should we deprecate the LOCK <table> shortcut now to ease the transition later? If people want that, I could go through the docs and add some appropriate warnings. best regards, Florian Pflug -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
