On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 7:32 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes: >> On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 3:37 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >>> Killing active sessions when it's not absolutely necessary is not an >>> asset. > >> That's a highly arguable point and I certainly don't agree with it. > > Your examples appear to rely on the assumption that background processes > exit instantly when the postmaster dies. Which they should not.
But they do. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
