On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 10:43 AM, Stephen Frost <sfr...@snowman.net> wrote: > * Tom Lane (t...@sss.pgh.pa.us) wrote: >> +1 for choosing something more mnemonic than "%o", btw. > > Alright, not to be *too* ridiculous about this, but I'm feeling like > '%R' might be better than '%U', if we don't mind overloading a single > letter based on case. I've always been annoyed at the lack of > distinction between 'user' and 'role' in our docs and feel it does lead > to some confusion. > > Updated patch attached, if people agree. Compiles, passes regressions, > works as advertised, etc.
I was thinking that %u/%U would have the advantage of implying some connection between the two things which is in fact present. %r/%R seems not quite as good to me. Also, let's paint it tangerine. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
