On Jan 11, 2011, at 2:07 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > The whole thing just seems too fragile and dangerous to be worth dealing > with given that actual usage will be a corner case. *I* sure wouldn't > trust it to work when the chips were down.
I hope this assessment proves to be incorrect, because like Magnus and Heikki, I think this will be a major usability improvement. It takes us from "there's a way to do that" to "it just works". ...Robert -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
