Josh Berkus wrote: >> Really, the biggest risk of such a GUC is the confusion factor >> when supporting people. > How is this different from our other backwards-compatibility GUCs? I thought Tom might be concerned about such a GUC destabilizing things in other ways. I just wanted to make clear how unlikely that was in this case. I agree that the risk of confusion in support is always there with a backwards-compatibility GUC. I'm still not taking a position either way on this, since I can see the merit of both arguments and it has little impact on me, personally. I'm just trying to be up-front about things so people can make an informed decision. -Kevin
-- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
