On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 2:31 PM, Magnus Hagander <mag...@hagander.net> wrote: > On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 20:28, Josh Berkus <j...@agliodbs.com> wrote: >> >>> hmmm I think "pg_stat_standby" might be more relevant but I definitely >>> agree something more newbie appropriate is in order. >> >> I'd be fine with that name, too. > > That seems kind of backwards though - given that the view only > contains data on the master...
I think pg_stat_replication is better than pg_stat_standby, but I'm still not convinced we shouldn't go with the obvious pg_stat_walsenders. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
