On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 03:04, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Jeff Davis <pg...@j-davis.com> writes: >> Personally, my utility for the old repo is not much (if it was anything >> important, I wouldn't have relied on the unofficial repo). But we should >> probably give a little bit of warning for folks that might want to >> rebase or translate some old notes. > > Well, I guess the question is how much warning. I suggested O(1 week) > but Robert seems to want O(1 year). As long as there's some agreed > deadline, I'm not very picky about what it is.
I don't need to get rid of it *now*, but I agree a deadline is good. How about we either say "when 9.1 is released", or we say "september 2011" because that's a year after we made the switch? -- Magnus Hagander Me: http://www.hagander.net/ Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/ -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
