Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes:
> On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 7:13 AM, Magnus Hagander <mag...@hagander.net> wrote:
>> Also, I notice that PGRES_COPY_BOTH was inserted "in the middle" of
>> the enum. Doesn't that mean we can get incorrect values for e.g.
>> PGRES_FATAL_ERROR if the client is built against one version of libpq
>> but executes against another? Shouldn't all such enum values always be
>> added at the end?
> I think you are right, and that we should fix this.
Yes, that was a completely wrong move :-(
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
