On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 12:14 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Fujii Masao <masao.fu...@gmail.com> writes:
>> How about doing target != ALL test at the head for the most common case
>> (target == ALL)?
>
> That's an idea, but the test you propose implements it incorrectly.

Thanks! I revised the patch.

Regards,

-- 
Fujii Masao
NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION
NTT Open Source Software Center

Attachment: signal-some-children-v3.patch
Description: Binary data

-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to