Merlin Moncure <mmonc...@gmail.com> wrote: > *) what's a good way to stress the clog severely? I'd like to pick > a degenerate case to get a better idea of the way things stand > without them. The worst I can think of is a large database with a 90/10 mix of reads to writes -- all short transactions. Maybe someone else can do better. In particular, I'm not sure how savepoints might play into a degenerate case. Since we're always talking about how to do better with hint bits during an unlogged bulk load, it would be interesting to benchmark one of those followed by a `select count(*) from newtable;` with and without the patch, on a data set too big to fit in RAM. > *) is there community interest in a full patch that fills in the > missing details not implemented here? I'm certainly curious to see real numbers. -Kevin
-- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
