On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 03:08:48PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > Kenneth Marshall <k...@rice.edu> writes: > > On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 02:10:39PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > >> [citation needed]? Exactly what characters are missing, and why would > >> the Unicode people have chosen to leave them out? It's not like they've > >> not heard of those encodings, I'm sure. > > > Here is an interesting description of some of the gotchas: > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Windows-1252 > > Well, it's interesting, but I see no glyphs on that page that lack > Unicode assignments. > > regards, tom lane > You are correct. I mis-read the text.
Regards, Ken -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
