Itagaki Takahiro <itagaki.takah...@gmail.com> writes: > I think so. It would be better to remove the CVC support and related code.
Will isolate that into another branch just in case and prepare a patch with that removed. > Preloading modules that defines CVC is a good direction to fix the issue, > but we need more consideration about where to do it. I checked for doing that too, but both shared_preload_libraries and local_preload_libraries are managed way earlier than the point where we can connect to a database a check what extensions it contains. So that appeared to me as a dead-end. Regards, -- Dimitri Fontaine http://2ndQuadrant.fr PostgreSQL : Expertise, Formation et Support -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
