> You can believe whatever you want, that doesn't make it true. completely agree. Like yours, Its just my point of view, not the reality.
I agree with most points here, but I wondering how many good ideas are killed with the thought: "this will be a performance killer with so many random access, lets discarded it". If in 80's the sequential access has more cost compared with random access (ok, there's not the SSD case), will be the PostgreSQL in the same design that it have nowadays ? -- Daniel Loureiro. -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
