On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 2:31 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes:
>> Not that I see anything to disagree with in this patch, but what
>> happened to posting patches in advance of committing them?  Or did I
>> just miss that part?
>
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-performance/2010-12/msg00073.php
>
> Possibly it should have been posted to -hackers instead, but surely you
> read -performance?

Oh, yeah I see it now.  I do read -performance, but with two orders of
magnitude more latency than -hackers.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to