On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 5:32 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Andrew Dunstan <and...@dunslane.net> writes: >> On 12/02/2010 05:01 PM, Tom Lane wrote: >>> In the past, proposals for this have always been rejected on the grounds >>> that it's impossible to assure a consistent dump if different >>> connections are used to read different tables. I fail to understand >>> why that consideration can be allowed to go by the wayside now. > >> Well, snapshot cloning should allow that objection to be overcome, no? > > Possibly, but we need to see that patch first not second.
Yes, by all means let's allow the perfect to be the enemy of the good. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
