Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes: > If we switched from per-tuple MVCC based on XIDs to per-page MVCC > based on LSNs and a rollback segment, all of this stuff would go out > the window. Hint bits, gone. Anti-wraparound VACUUM, gone. CRCs, > feasible. Visibility map... we might still need that, but the > page-level bits go away.
> Of course, it would also create new problems. Yup, we've seen that proposal before. It's called Oracle. There's no good reason to believe that we'd have a net win after we were done switching over ... not to mention the likelihood that they hold a ton of patents about particular aspects of doing things that way. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers