Dimitri Fontaine <dimi...@2ndquadrant.fr> writes:
> Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> writes:
>> Right, AFAIK there is nothing in KNNGIST that would involve an on-disk
>> data change.
> But any external module relying on GiST will have to provide for the new
> function you're thinking about, right? Updating was already needed to
> cope with the newer consistent API, I guess.
ISTM that it should be possible to allow an opclass to not supply the
new hook function if it doesn't support any ordering operators. So
that's not really a serious problem. The existing patch approaches
this by having two different APIs for the Consistent function depending
on whether the opclass supports ordering operators or not. I find that
pretty icky, even though it nominally avoids breaking existing opclass
modules.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
