On Wed, 1 Dec 2010 12:47:13 +0100, Magnus Hagander <mag...@hagander.net> wrote: > On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 19:49, Radosław Smogura <m...@smogura.eu> wrote: >> Hello, >> >> Maybe you are interested about this what I done with JDBC > > <snip> > > >> Driver is here >> http://www.rsmogura.net/pgsql/pgjdbc_exp_20101130_C.tar.gz is >> currently JDK 6 compatible (will be not), compressed patch takes about >> 136kb >> gziped. > > Is there any particular reason why this work can't be maintained as a > branch to the main driver? My understanding is your work is based off > that one? Being able to work like that would make things a lot easier > to review. Yes, it's based on this, with CVS subfolders in sources. I don't see any problems to maintain this as branch. Ah only one need to read something about CVS & branching.
> That said, such a process would also be a lot easier if the JDBC > driver wasn't in cvs ;) Yes, SVN is much more nicer. > > -- > Magnus Hagander > Me: http://www.hagander.net/ > Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/ -- ---------- Radosław Smogura http://www.softperience.eu -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
