Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes: > I'd pick pg_execute_from_file() and just plain pg_execute(), myself.
For the record there's only one name exposed at the SQL level. Or do you want me to expand the patch to actually include a pg_execute() version of the function, that would execute the query in PG_GETARG_TEXT_P(0)? > On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 11:48 AM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >> Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes: >> What did you think of "pg_execute_sql_file"? > > That, I like. Ok, I call pg_execute_sql_file() the winner and will prepare a new patch later tonight, now is comute time. Regards, -- Dimitri Fontaine http://2ndQuadrant.fr PostgreSQL : Expertise, Formation et Support -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
