On Fri, 2010-11-26 at 01:11 -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > Simon Riggs <si...@2ndquadrant.com> writes: > > That would mean running GetCurrentTransactionId() inside LockAcquire() > > > if (lockmode >= AccessExclusiveLock && > > locktag->locktag_type == LOCKTAG_RELATION && > > !RecoveryInProgress()) > > (void) GetCurrentTransactionId(); > > > Any objections to that fix? > > Could we have a wal level test in there too please? It's pretty awful > in any case...
Slightly neater version of same idea applied to resolve this. -- Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/books/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training and Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
