On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 22:03, Heikki Linnakangas
<heikki.linnakan...@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
> I propose the attached API instead. This has a clear separation between plan
> and execution.
The APIs seem to be cleaner. The previous ones might be too straight
implementation of the SQL standard.
But I have some questions about the new APIs:
1. Doesn't FdwPlan need to inherit Plan struct?
2. Doesn't FdwPlan need to support copyObject()?
3. If "Datum *values, bool *isnulls" is the better interface,
why do we use TupleTableSlot? We might have the similar issue
in the index-only scan; it also handles virtual tuples.
--
Itagaki Takahiro
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
