Tom Lane wrote: > Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@commandprompt.com> writes: > > Excerpts from Bruce Momjian's message of vie nov 19 00:17:59 -0300 2010: > >> Alvaro Herrera wrote: > >>> I think we should use inet_ntop where available to print the address. > >> > >> Good idea because inet_ntop() is thread-safe. Does that work on IPv6? > >> You indicated that inet_ntoa() does not. > > > According to opengroup.org, IPv6 should work if the underlying libraries > > support it, whereas inet_ntoa explicitely does not. > > http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/009695399/functions/inet_ntop.html > > http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/009695399/functions/inet_addr.html > > I get the impression that you guys have forgotten the existence of > src/backend/utils/adt/inet_net_ntop.c
Yeah, that is nice, but we are calling this from libpq, not the backend. Let me work up a patch. -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + It's impossible for everything to be true. + -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
