Marc G. Fournier wrote: > On Thu, 25 Apr 2002, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > > > > Marc is suggesting we may want to match Oracle somehow. > > > > I just want to have our SET work on a sane manner. > > Myself, I wonder why Oracle went the route they went ... does anyone have > access to a Sybase / Informix system, to confirm how they do it? Is > Oracle the 'odd man out', or are we going to be that? *Adding* something > (ie. DROP TABLE rollbacks) that nobody appears to have is one thing ... > but changing the behaviour is a totally different ...
Yes, let's find out what the others do. I don't see DROP TABLE rollbacking as totally different. How is it different from SET? -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us [EMAIL PROTECTED] | (610) 853-3000 + If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026 ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
