2010/11/16 Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us>: > Martijn van Oosterhout <klep...@svana.org> writes: >> On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 10:32:01PM +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote: >>> On tis, 2010-11-16 at 21:05 +0100, marcin mank wrote: >>>> It would be nice if we could have some mapping of locale names bult >>>> in, so one doesn`t have to write alternative sql depending on DB >>>> server OS: > >>> Sure that would be nice, but how do you hope to do that? > >> Given that each operating system comes with a different set of >> collations, it seems unlikely you could even find two collations on >> different OSes that even correspond. > > Yeah, the *real* portability problem here is that the locale behavior is > likely to be different, not just the name. I don't think we'd be doing > people many favors by masking behavioral differences between a forced > common name. >
no, minimally there is same behave of cs_CZ.utf8 and cs_CZ.iso88592. But without any "alias" user should to modify source code, when he change a encoding. Pavel > regards, tom lane > -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
