On Thu, 25 Apr 2002 16:38:00 -0400 (EDT) "Bruce Momjian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Nice report. I think we should start thinking of hiding the hash option > from users, or warn them more forcefully, rather than hold it out as a > possible option for them.
Why not do something Peter E. suggested earlier: if the functionality of hash indexes is a subset of that offered by btrees, it might be good to remove the hash index code and treat USING 'hash' as an alias for USING 'btree'? Cheers, Neil -- Neil Conway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> PGP Key ID: DB3C29FC ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
