Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes: > On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 2:06 PM, Josh Berkus <j...@agliodbs.com> wrote: >>> I'm not ignoring them; I just choose to work on other issues, since >>> there is no viable proposal for fixing them. I don't intend to put >>> my time into dead ends.
>> So, that's a "show me a patch and we'll talk"? Understood, then. > Or even just a proposal. Well, he did have a proposal ... it just wasn't very credible. Moving the hint bits around is at best a zero-sum game; it seems likely to degrade cases we now handle well more than it improves cases we don't. I think what we need is a fundamentally new idea, and I've not seen one. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers