Marko Tiikkaja <marko.tiikk...@cs.helsinki.fi> writes:
> On 13 Nov 2010, at 15:41, David Fetter <da...@fetter.org> wrote:
>> Similarly, if a normal CTE called a data-changing function but was
>> nevertheless not referred to, it would still run.
> Actually, it wouldn't.
Indeed, and that was considered a feature when we did it. I think
that having wCTEs behave arbitrarily differently on this point
might be a bad idea.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
