Josh Berkus wrote: > On 10/08/2010 02:44 PM, Robert Haas wrote: > >> In any case, I would expect that GIN could actually do this quite > >> efficiently. What we'd probably want is a concept of a "null word", > >> with empty indexable rows entered in the index as if they contained the > >> null word. So there'd be just one index entry with a posting list of > >> however many such rows there are. > > So, given the lack of objections to this idea, do we have a plan for > fixing GIN?
Is this a TODO? -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + It's impossible for everything to be true. + -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
