Markus Wanner wrote: > I stand corrected. Do you actually use the TapReporter? No. I know so little about TAP that I wasn't aware that dtester output was in the TAP format until I saw your post on this thread, so I went searching for the format to see what I might do to become more compliant -- and found that through sheer luck I happened to be compliant with the proposed spec. :-) > Maybe I confused with the CursesReporter, which gets rather > confused by custom output. I can check what that requires. Perhaps I can cause the detail output to not confuse that. [off to check...] -Kevin
-- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
