On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 5:00 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > So maybe Aidan's got a good idea here. It would sure be a lot easier > to shoehorn checksum checking in as an optional feature if the checksums > were kept someplace else.
Would it? I thought the only problem was the hint bits being set behind the checksummers back. That'll still happen even if it's written to a different place. -- greg -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
