Hiroshi Inoue wrote: > Bruce Momjian wrote: > > > > Hiroshi Inoue wrote: > > > Bruce Momjian wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I voted not only ? but also 2 and 3. > > > > > > > And haven't I asked twice or so if it's a vote ? > > > > > > > > > > > > Yes, it is a vote, and now that we see how everyone feels, we can > > > > > > decide what to do. > > > > > > > > > > > > Hiroshi, you can't vote for 2, 3, and ?. > > > > > > > > > > Why ? > > > > > I don't think the items are exclusive. > > > > > > > > Well, 2 says roll back only after transaction aborts, > > > > > > Sorry for my poor understanding. > > > Isn't it 1 ? > > > > OK, original email attached. 1 rolls back all SETs in an aborted > > transaction. > > > 2 ignores SETs after transaction aborts, but SETs before > > the transaction aborted are honored. > > Must I understand this from your previous posting > (2 says roll back only after transaction aborts,) > or original posting ? What I understood was 2 only > says that SET fails between a failure and the > subsequenct ROLLBACK call.
Yes, 2 says that SET fails between failure query and COMMIT/ROLLBACK call, which is current behavior. -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us [EMAIL PROTECTED] | (610) 853-3000 + If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026 ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
